“0% Disagreement”
All or Nothing is Almost Over
I met Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. last weekend. I wanted to get eyes on him and shake his hand so I attended a small gathering in Los Angeles with many others who have volunteered for CHD and local Health Freedom groups. I was early and made a beeline to him. He was warm and friendly. I told him if my late father had lived to hear a candidate for President promise an executive order to end Pharma ads on TV he’d have been overjoyed. He asked about him and then we discussed our mutual friend Dr. Christiane Northrup. He lit up when I mentioned her and we agreed on her perfectly timed statements at his announcement in Boston. I suggested a pic for her and he promptly grabbed my phone and took a selfie. His youthful and direct motion with the phone and his selfie skills reminded me of my teenage kids; no nonsense, swift, quick. For some reason this totally cracked me up, and one of the pics is an unflattering one of me howling, because I felt like the boomer. After our chat, I did as I was asked, which was to order him upstairs with Sue, his assistant. “He will not be able to stop meeting people, so that would help if you just tell him to follow me after you introduce yourself.” I found him warm and kind. Simultaneously preoccupied and in the moment, appropriate in anyone who lives for a mission.
Mainstream media wants to paint RFK as “re-litigating Covid”. Not true, friends. Much to my disappointment after his speech, the answer to my question on the last three years started with ‘I’m not talking about it. People are moving on’.
This is not a political “endorsement” (as if that matters from me). Besides, I’m done donating emotion to politics and focusing on personalities over principles. Let me be perfectly clear: I have lived in LA for decades and have been socially pummeled for the last three years. I have aged more in the last 18 months than in the last two decades. I’ve also grown up. I was like a walking metal detector at that event, leading with suspicion and scanning for hypocrisy.
So, yes, I get it. Everyone is armed with a bunch of reasons to write off RFK. Indeed he is a stunner, even pushing 70, and he himself admits a rebellious youth that “lasted until age 60”. (LOL) He also said he has enough skeletons in his closet to win the vote. None of it matters as much as the facts he has dug out, studied and memorized for successful litigation and what each citizen thinks of them. Where would we be without the INFORMATION he has studied and shared? Where would the good doctors be, especially the who leaned over to me and said “great question.”? (He is still on staff after legally and victoriously fighting his hospital.) The facts are ALL that matter now. Add to that what each citizen thinks of his detractors unwilling to debunk his research in public. They won’t even try. (Find my Title idea in that brilliant piece from Chris Bray)
If we are able to accept that we can’t wait on perfect people, and simply require the truth, more will continue to pay attention, more will be revealed, his primary win or not, his election or not. In post-plandemic time, 18 months from now is an eternity.
If you don’t already know why legacy media has trained people to hate RFK for 20 years, it’s time to find out. His book is a good place to start, it sold a million copies in 3 months which is a metric that earns bookstore displays and ads all over the place, unless you tick off the ones who sell pills and shots.
Tucker Carlson’s most recent episode on Twitter is worth taking in. You’ll join about 18 Million fellow humans (so far) by listening. No big whoop. Crazy fringe conspiracy theorist crowd.
This is about rising above personality psyops and taking in the information. I personally felt as though I had been to therapy after I listened to Ep. 6 of Tucker on Twitter. (Above) My husband asked “what’s goin on over there?” as I put my iPad down, stretched back on the couch and stared at the ceiling, taking deep breaths. “I just got a front row seat to how pervasive and desperate this pitch was, to smear anyone who listened to the smeared.” There was something about hearing the clip of a woman from now-bankrupt Vice News. She was revealing to me what was said, what was believed about me, even by close friends and family. Its almost unbelievable to hear it after the fact. I’m so glad I never heard any of it back then. Would’ve been even more painful.
All I was really doing was practicing a healthy selfishness and suspicion, on behalf of the two young athletes in my home. They face enough risk on motorcycles in the desert and on surfboards in the ocean. They deserved protection from potential harm. I didn’t want to add risk, and I trusted the whisper of my late father in my very DNA, who taught suspicion of checks with lots of zeros for joining a consensus chorus.
This is about recovering information and critical thought that doesn’t boast “0% disagreement”. Agreeing is not the priority for critical thought among free people. The priority is respect for the truth. Agreeing is also not the priority for “science”. But when you accept that the actual definition of science is not respected in the context of the media today, it all becomes clear. Let’s consider the definition of science.
science
sī′əns
noun
The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena.
Such activities restricted to a class of natural phenomena.
A systematic method or body of knowledge in a given area.
I’d say this is a phenomena worth debating:
1983: 10 vaccines, 1 in 10,000 autistic children
2013: 32 vaccines, 1 in 88 autistic children
2022: 72 vaccines, 1 in 36 autistic children *
*Source: CDC
I’d also say it’s phenomenal that the crowd boasting safe and effective is not liable for their product, and the source questioning safety is not even asking for liability, just for debate.
I wish you all a day full of brain challenges that a legacy media outlet didn’t curate for you in a puzzle or game. Just go with RFK’s book.
Well said!